<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Big Push for Midwives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pushformidwives.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pushformidwives.org</link>
	<description>Certified Professional Midwives NOW.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:56:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steering Committee by Despite doctors' concerns, home births are up &#124; Seattle/LocalHealthGuide</title>
		<link>http://pushformidwives.org/about/steering-committee/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Despite doctors' concerns, home births are up &#124; Seattle/LocalHealthGuide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pushformidwives.org/?page_id=374#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] District, they may be and sometimes are prosecuted for practicing medicine without a license, says Katherine Prown, the group&#8217;s campaign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] District, they may be and sometimes are prosecuted for practicing medicine without a license, says Katherine Prown, the group&#8217;s campaign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Study: Two-Thirds of OB-GYN Clinical Guidelines Have No Basis in Science by Leslynotes - Interview Your Ob</title>
		<link>http://pushformidwives.org/2011/08/15/acog-study/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslynotes - Interview Your Ob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pushformidwives.org/?p=562#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] The Big Push for Midwives highlighted a recent study focusing on the quality of science based articles published in the American Journal of Obstetricians and Gynecology (ACOG) and reported only 1/3 of OB related articles were based on good and consistent science and research. The remaining 2/3 are based on professional opinion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Big Push for Midwives highlighted a recent study focusing on the quality of science based articles published in the American Journal of Obstetricians and Gynecology (ACOG) and reported only 1/3 of OB related articles were based on good and consistent science and research. The remaining 2/3 are based on professional opinion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

